I know that physicists will not like my ideas, my version of reality and probable dismiss it immediately, and I fully understand why. First, you need to, if not entirely giving up on the idea of energy (the most useful tool science has), at least radically rethink the whole concept of it. Then, you need to give up on the idea of the plank length being the smallest meaningful size and think on a scale that seems impossibly small and rethink the concept of entropy. On top of that you must imaging that there is no such thing as movement only virtual moment because the universe is a perfect solid. It sounds ridiculous even to me. However, the real problem, for this idea is getting any proof of its validity. If theoretical physicists, must resort to mathematical trickery such as Perturbation Theory, to understand simple interactions between subatomic particles. How much harder is going to be to mathematically show, the complex interaction of thousands or millions, of bits of information creating values that form just one subatomic partial. Not to mention the fact, that if it is impossible to detect anything small than the plank length it would also be impossible to obtain experimental proof of any mathematical model you could develop. The point is, when scientists, study nature they draw their conclusions from data. Data is only information that must be intellectualised to be understood. Therefore, they can only see the effects on the data they receive and cannot fully understand the cause behind the effect. So, I can see why there will not be a pure information theory any time soon.
However, at least my version of the universe makes sense (at least to me) and it does contain plausible explanations, for quantum phenomena and relativity. As well as defining information and reality. Something modern, science theories have yet to do. It seems to me that modern physics is trapped in an intellectual box of energy waves and particles; and if an interpretation of the world is not completely weird and almost impossible to understand than it cannot be right. I think it is a big mistake to ignore the fact that what we call reality, is a model of the world we construct in our heads; all be it unconsciously, for the sole purposes of survival and navigation. That model is not designed to give us all the answers we need to understand the full workings of the universe (reality). So, I think science should be thinking outside the box and just not except experimental information as reality. It also should try to understand how information creates reality. However, that is just my humble opinion,
0000